|
|
Wonder Woman (Page 2)
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Offline
|
|
It is a very good movie, just not as earth-shattering-life-changing as people are claiming. I'm not really sure where this is going to end up in the annals of comic hero history. Better than Superman '78? F no. People that weren't alive then need to know that Superman was an event, not just some silly flick that came and went. It was a Donner film, a Williams score, based on one of the most beloved super heroes of all time, and they nailed it. I think if they look another look at the script, or perhaps put in a scene or two that was probably deleted which would explain a few things, it would have been better. That said, third act was a complete mess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
By far the best DC movie since the Nolan Batman movies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by besson3c
By far the best DC movie since the Nolan Batman movies.
That's not saying much
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Shaddim's sock drawer
Status:
Offline
|
|
After thinking it over I've relaxed my views on WW. It was fine, I'd even say the first half was wonderful (heh) but that last half was pretty awful. So, first half 4/5 stars, last half 1.5/5, with an average of 2.5 (because the last means more than the first, to me). That still isn't a pass, IMO, since a movie needs a 3 to get approval, but if a person is really into DC comics' films, it's worth a watch and definitely not the worst to come out in the last several years. Better than BvS theatrical, not as good as MoS, just sort of in the middle.
|
"I have a dream, that my four little children will one day live in a
nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin,
but by the content of their character." - M.L.King Jr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
What I liked about the movie pretty much centered around WW as a character, and not so much the movie's plot.
I liked how there was some mystery to WW herself, and the history of her people. We knew that her motivations were pure and naive, but didn't know exactly what sort of decisions she would make. Part of this was because there aren't really any overpowered female superhero characters to function as some sort of model, so as a character she was sort of fresh with a clean slate.
I hope there are many more strong female characters like her in movies to come. I think the strong male character archetype has been pretty worn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by besson3c
What I liked about the movie pretty much centered around WW as a character, and not so much the movie's plot.
That's part of the problem. TOO much was spent on her. Everyone else was "disposable".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status:
Offline
|
|
"That Superman movie really spent too much time on Superman. I really wanted to learn more about Jimmy Olsen's character growth."
- said no one ever
It's her movie, she's allowed to be the main character. I thought WW did a pretty good job with her origin and culture shock in the real world, and a decent job with Steve Trevor's motives/empathy too. The other Amazons were real people too. Steve's buddies didn't have much time but I liked all of them and their POV.
Absolutely they could have kept all this good character stuff and also tidied the ending (see my previous nitpicks).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by starman
That's part of the problem. TOO much was spent on her. Everyone else was "disposable".
It held my interest. There was never much depth to Lois Lane or Lex Luther either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by andi*pandi
"That Superman movie really spent too much time on Superman. I really wanted to learn more about Jimmy Olsen's character growth."
- said no one ever
It's her movie, she's allowed to be the main character. I thought WW did a pretty good job with her origin and culture shock in the real world, and a decent job with Steve Trevor's motives/empathy too. The other Amazons were real people too. Steve's buddies didn't have much time but I liked all of them and their POV.
Absolutely they could have kept all this good character stuff and also tidied the ending (see my previous nitpicks).
Do you think this movie would have been as strong with a male director, or do you think the female directing POV had a relevant impact on the results?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by starman
Well made, but the third act was a mess.
Originally Posted by starman
That said, third act was a complete mess.
So like...Dark Knight?
[EDIT] Fun (or not) idea: find a superhero movie in the last 15 years that didn't run 30 minutes too long and limp across the finish line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by andi*pandi
"That Superman movie really spent too much time on Superman. I really wanted to learn more about Jimmy Olsen's character growth."
- said no one ever
Jimmy Olsen wasn't a major character. Lois Lane was. I felt that Steve Trevor was just "there".
Also, the whole "you promised you'd take me to the war" dialog was eyeroll-inducing. The War isn't being held at Wembley Stadium. There were dialog bits like that which made me want to rewrite some parts.
Also...
Why didn't Diana take out the bombs? Steve's sacrifice was pathetic and stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status:
Offline
|
|
On the contrary starman, I thought Steve...
had a lot of good lines about his past, his conflict about being a spy, and his dad. He was very likeable. They were mysterious about his past, and that intrigued me... but probably it would take another movie to explain it, and not contribute to the WWI plot. A lot of his character we can fill in the blanks, for every other world-weary spy of this type we've seen in movies. They shot themselves in the foot killing him, potential for future scenes with diana and steve going back home to his family, etc.
I totally agree Diana could have taken out the bombs, but kind of get "Steve's willingness to sacrifice" proved to her that humanity wasn't doomed. So yeah, a) she totally could have rescued him, or b) if he must risk himself, why doesn't he parachute out of there... Argh.
That is not to say they won't retcon his death away, but I don't get the sense that they are planning more historical Wonder Woman movies, just present day Justice League et all. Which is too bad, I would love to see a return to Amazon Island.
"take me to war" from the POV of someone whose whole world was an island, sure, she imagined one battlefield, not a whole continent. I could have hoped they'd spent more time on that loong (magicly speedy) boat journey discussing current events/fashion/history/geography/war/etc, not the 12 volume set of sex, but ya know, the funny.
Originally Posted by besson3c
[Do you think this movie would have been as strong with a male director, or do you think the female directing POV had a relevant impact on the results?
The only way to compare is apples to apples, and the only other cases to compare it too are Catwoman and Elektra, so... I think a female director might have helped guide certain positive decisions, like costume and history... But I would have felt fine with Joss Whedon directing also.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Shaddim's sock drawer
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Jawbone54
[EDIT] Fun (or not) idea: find a superhero movie in the last 15 years that didn't run 30 minutes too long and limp across the finish line.
GotG 1
|
"I have a dream, that my four little children will one day live in a
nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin,
but by the content of their character." - M.L.King Jr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Jawbone54
[EDIT] Fun (or not) idea: find a superhero movie in the last 15 years that didn't run 30 minutes too long and limp across the finish line.
The Avengers
All three Captain America movies
GotG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Shaddim's sock drawer
Status:
Offline
|
|
Steve's death was wholly pointless, it made no sense at all, and only reinforced the tired old male disposability trope. That's no way to treat a character with such a long, illustrious history in comics. Hell, before the complete revamp of the Wonder Woman title, he was so revered by the gods of Mt Olympus they invited him to live among them when he retired, revitalizing him and making him an immortal.
Also, while Gal looked great, and the action scenes (the ones that weren't pure CGI-fests) were very good, I found her acting to be merely adequate. I don't mean this as a slam against her abilities, but she'd benefit greatly from some advanced acting classes.
|
"I have a dream, that my four little children will one day live in a
nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin,
but by the content of their character." - M.L.King Jr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by starman
The Avengers
All three Captain America movies
GotG
Original Iron Man.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status:
Offline
|
|
Some of the xmen movies were excellent too... first two, and first class?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Cap'n Tightpants
Steve's death was wholly pointless, it made no sense at all, and only reinforced the tired old male disposability trope. That's no way to treat a character with such a long, illustrious history in comics. Hell, before the complete revamp of the Wonder Woman title, he was so revered by the gods of Mt Olympus they invited him to live among them when he retired, revitalizing him and making him an immortal.
Agreed, for the most part... it was either a waste/throwaway of his character, their great years-long partnership, or they plan to do a retcon that won't make sense and will totally make his "sacrifice" pointless. Also, with setting this movie in WWI, they made it very unlikely that Steve Trevor would still be alive in present day.
I looked up the male disposability trope and don't buy it here, for Steve. This wasn't casual cannon fodder, it was heroic sacrifice. Was Spock disposable? Also, it's not like Steve Trevor twisted his ankle and had to yell, help help! and provide a distraction from the hero busy saving the world, nearly every female sidekick ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by andi*pandi
Some of the xmen movies were excellent too... first two, and first class?
They are all good movies, but the original X-men is actually more than 15 years old and the second is close enough to that limit that I didn't bring it up anyway. First Class is fine but arguably did become a bit of mess at the end.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Star Trek, Jack Ryan, probably some other, now Wonder Woman. Chris Pine does like riding a bike doesn't he?
I liked the film, as said already, its better than other DC films, Nolan Batman excepted. When the credits came up at the end, Etta Candy - Lucy Davis was a surprise, she sort of looked familiar, but I couldn't place her watching the film. Dawn from The Office (UK)...
|
It'll be much easier if you just comply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Offline
|
|
OK, so....been thinking about No Man's Land
She says, "No, but that's what I'm doing to do".
Cue applauds in theater.
But then...she gets stuck in the middle and needs help? DAFUQ?
So essentially she did nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status:
Offline
|
|
What scene were you watching?
Men with mouths agape at her selflessness suddenly realize that oh yeah, if she's risking herself, so can they. Also, while she's the distraction (tank) they can flank. I saw soldiers scrambling to action, not to rescue a damsel in distress.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by andi*pandi
What scene were you watching?
Men with mouths agape at her selflessness suddenly realize that oh yeah, if she's risking herself, so can they. Also, while she's the distraction (tank) they can flank. I saw soldiers scrambling to action, not to rescue a damsel in distress.
Well, let's break that scene down, shall we?
She gets up, says that *SHE* is going to help the villagers.
SHE walks across and starts taking fire.
The commander tells his men to not engage, "that's an order".
So she's taking fire, and the soldiers can't do jack because they're told NOT to.
But Steve & Co. magically take out all the Germans on the other side while she's distracting them. I thought Steve just said that the Germans have "every square inch covered".
So she's a distraction. Well, she didn't say "I'm going to go distract them"
After Steve & Co. take out some Germans, THEN the commander tells them men to go.
It seemed like ok, is she just distracting them? Why not just go in the trench and destroy all the weapons?
So in the end all she really did was distract them.
*cough*youtube*cough*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
Still haven't seen it. Plan was to see it Friday.
At the moment, it's not going to be showing. At least in the three theatres it's showing right now.
Is this computer ****ery as they rearrange screens for Transformers, or is it actually only getting a 20 day wide release?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Shaddim's sock drawer
Status:
Offline
|
|
The drop-off has been intense, like most other superhero films.
|
"I have a dream, that my four little children will one day live in a
nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin,
but by the content of their character." - M.L.King Jr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
WW actually had less dropoff than most superhero movies, with 43% to second weekend and 30% to third (doesn't say what it is 30% of, but from math it seems to 30% of second weekend). It is now outpacing MoS and Suicide Squad.
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/showdow...c&id=dcuni.htm
Perhaps the entire industry assumed a more traditional dropoff and are now out of screens to show something on. I know that Sixth Sense back in the day had a negative dropoff (as in, more people saw it the second weekend than the first, and more the third than the second) and it threw the entire planning for cinemas into disarray.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
Well, for the Thursday matinee, we're the only people who have bought tickets so far.
As an aside, gawd I heart reserved seating at movies.
ProTip: row D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Shaddim's sock drawer
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by P
WW actually had less dropoff than most superhero movies, with 43% to second weekend and 30% to third (doesn't say what it is 30% of, but from math it seems to 30% of second weekend). It is now outpacing MoS and Suicide Squad.
I wasn't talking about just DC.
|
"I have a dream, that my four little children will one day live in a
nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin,
but by the content of their character." - M.L.King Jr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Drop-off is actually better than all the Marvel movies I could think of to check, and only Avengers and Iron Man come close. Even generally well-regarded Logan has a worse drop-off. Now the opening weekend was far from great, so it isn't like it is going to be some sort of best of all time - even beating BvS might be hard - but there is some bounce here.
(Boxoffiicemojo is the source for all of the above, BTW).
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
They finally figured out the math and gave it screens for Friday.
Which is good, because that was ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
Didn't see it until tonight.
Well, it was good for a DC movie I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
I'm almost positive I got the censored ending, but I'm slightly doubting myself.
I distinctly remember thinking something was supposed to be happening to the skyline, but couldn't find it.
Looking at that GIF, it doesn't seem like it could be missed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm wondering it if was changed, I saw it Sunday and don't recall seeing any smoke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
So, I disliked the first act. Except for the painted stories, I felt it lacked imagination.
Well, they were quite imaginative in terms of new ways to have gratuitous panty shots.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
Related, I definitely give the movie props for the fight coordination. It didn't feel like wire-fu.
However, the high frame rate shots were distracting.
Speaking of fight coordination, they showed the trailer for La Femme Atomic Blonde.
Sold.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm scanning your posts for criticism of Gal Gadot.
Tread lightly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
Speaking of which, does this seem like utter bullcrap to the rest of y'all?
Countless fans came the Israeli-born actress' defense last week after news broke that she was paid just $300,000 for the summer blockbuster — but it turns out that sum isn't all that uncommon for a relatively unknown actor's first shot at a superhero flick.
Chris Evans was paid the same rate for his first "Captain America" film in 2011 and Chris Hemsworth reportedly raked in even less for his debut as Thor the same year.
Considering that these films are nearly guaranteed to be a financial (if not critical) success, how are these actors getting paid so little? "Little" being a relative term, of course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status:
Offline
|
|
If that's what Evans and Helmsworth got paid, I am ok with it. She is an unknown.
Plus, she got the same amount for batman v Superman, where basically "all she did was one fight scene and check her email."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by Jawbone54
I'm scanning your posts for criticism of Gal Gadot.
Tread lightly.
Nothing to criticize.
She rocked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Jawbone54
Considering that these films are nearly guaranteed to be a financial (if not critical) success, how are these actors getting paid so little? "Little" being a relative term, of course.
In the case of Marvel, they sign contracts for multiple movies with an escalating pay scale, so the Chrises et al rake it in on the later movies.
I'm kind of OK with it. If the movie does poorly, then the mostly unknown leads got paid 300 grand for a single shoot plus some promotion and are free to do something else while the studio moves on to another idea. If the movie does well, the studio makes money and is incentivised to make a sequel where the actors are paid more, while still keeping costs sane. The only case where Marvel was forced to re-up was with Robert Downey Jr. He reportedly used that chance to not only get rich but to also improve the contracts for some of his co-stars, as he thought that they didn't get paid enough.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by P
The only case where Marvel was forced to re-up was with Robert Downey Jr. He reportedly used that chance to not only get rich but to also improve the contracts for some of his co-stars, as he thought that they didn't get paid enough.
Yet another reason to love the guy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think it is partly that he feels obligated to pay it forward (he was essentially unemployable after coming out of jail, and is back partly because directors and other actors stood up for him) and partly because he wanted to keep the Avengers around and successful because it meant more paydays for him.
This is all rumors, but the story is that Marvel only signed up Chris Evans (Captain America) for all the Avengers movies. RDJ and Chris Hemsworth (Thor) each got 3+1 deals, 3 single movies and 1 Avengers, while Scarlett Johanssen only had a single picture deal. Jeremy Renner and Mark Ruffalo both signed on for multi-picture deals, but it was always clear that they would be only part of the ensemble, never in solo movies, and neither was a superstar that opens movies anyway. Both the Chrises and ScarJo got $500k for Avengers, while Renner and Ruffalo reportedly got less. RDJ had this deal structured so he got a percent of the gross. As you may have noticed, Avengers did rather well - RDJ got north of $50 million for that movie alone. This did not pass unnoticed among the rest of the cast or the industry.
Marvel's thinking was that only Cap is essential to an Avengers movie - everyone else can be replaced. If Hemsworth didn't want to do it, well...I guess Thor is busy in Asgard right now, sorry about that, here is Vision instead. This also put a nice ceiling on the salary requests, as Marvel could say with some logic that they didn't want to pay anyone more than what they paid Cap, and his salary was set in stone already. The success of the Iron Man singles kinda killed that idea. Every market research Marvel and Disney could make made it clear that an Avengers 2 without RDJ would not sell. Marvel needed RDJ more than he needed them, and he knew it.
At the same time, Hemsworth had grown to be a big star, and apparently hated the diet and exercise regimen he had to do to be Thor. Do that for small time money when other studios wanted to pay him $5 million to show up? Why bother? ScarJo also demanded more money than Marvel was willing to offer.
At this point RDJ apparently pushed for better deals for his costars. He did not sign until Hemsworth and ScarJo were on board, and supposedly even pushed for Marvel to renegotiate some of the deals for actors they had already locked up. Just to add insult to injury, Joss Whedon (who clearly knew what he was doing) turned in a script that simply would not work without Tony Stark. Not Iron Man - Tony Stark. Marvel couldn't even put someone else in that armor.
So Marvel folded. The details of all of this are unknown, and while none of the others got anywhere near the payday RDJ got, they all seem happy now, and several of the stars have signed up for extra movies without much noise. At the same time the call sheet for Avengers 3 and 4 is absolutely bonkers, so Marvel clearly isn't going out of business because of actor salaries.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
And back on topic, WW has now beaten BvS on domestic gross and even has a few well-regarded Marvel singles behind it. Not too shabby.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by P
BvS
I'm going out on a limb here...
God, I hated this sooooooo much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by P
And back on topic, WW has now beaten BvS on domestic gross and even has a few well-regarded Marvel singles behind it. Not too shabby.
Adjusted for inflation?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
I only looked a couple of years back, and no, I did not adjust for inflation. at least Dr Strange and Captain America: Winter Soldier are behind it by a large enough margin that a few percent from inflation cannot possibly make up for it.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
Was Dr. Strange any good?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Offline
|
|
Sorry, but WW is behind Winter Solder WITHOUT adjusting.
Winter Soldier WW: $714k
Wonder Woman WW: $708k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
He said domestic gross.
$346MM for WW, $259MM for WS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|